I’m sick and tired of the word “theory” even out of the mouth of someone who actually understands what the word means. Some time ago, the iPad Session Drummer asked, “Is a theory a fact?” This question is a trap because it can’t be answered with the simple Yes or No he was looking for. It’s like asking, “Is a human body a bone?” The answer should technically be No, but we all know bones are present, yet if we stop at No, suddenly osteoporosis is just a fabrication by Big Pharma to push calcium supplements. Theories work the same way. A theory is not a fact, but instead an interpretation of multiple facts, observations, and repeatable experiments. Calling it a theory is a kind of academic shorthand for, “But if you’ve got new data….” because unlike conspiracy theories, which never seem to change, scientific theories are always changing as new data emerges. There’s nothing wrong with this; it’s how progress is made. Where it does become a problem is when people (self-proclaimed laymen in this case) take this uncertainty to mean “anything goes” and simply offer up any crackpot idea that sounds good to them and call it equally valid by default, regardless of any actual data.
Here’s a long tirade about “Theories” from Laz X, a flathead who came to the defense of John Armstrong in his “Garbage in, garbage out” video wherein he claims this simple four-word phrase proves everything we know about the shape of the earth completely and totally wrong. I’d say take a shot every time you hear something dumb, but some of you may have work tomorrow, or at least wish to remember where you’d put your keys.
My idea of theory is simple, and universal. It cannot be changed or twisted to fit anything as fact. ( hypothesis, thesis, conjecture, supposition, speculation, postulation, postulate, proposition, premise, surmise, assumption, presupposition) in other words, GUESSING. A theory is a guess in layman’s terms. And to use Dawkins as an expert on Theory is idiotic. He is biased from the start and believes a theory is something that it’s not, as does most scientists.
Actually it doesn’t matter what level equipment you use, actually the more technical or powerful the better. Experiments can be produced by any equipment. But lets use high powered high range lens on an expensive camera. If you apply the spherical equation to an experiment such as ships on the horizon at a distance. The math is said experiment falls short. Is incorrect. By the math a ship should not be seen by the shore line at 8 miles. Yet it is with a powerful enough lens, and this experiment has been repeated over and over again. Also, the ships in the distance if seen on a sphere would tilt away from you showing the mast or top angling forward as it travels over the horizon. This too is not a fact. The ships, or city building, or whatever is in the distance on the horizon are in fact straight, level, and still visible beyond the distance the sphere math claims. Repeatable
As for other countries having stuff on the moon is just no so at all. We have never gone to the moon, and any pictures of any equipment or whathaveyou seen on the moon are fabricated. Satellites do not exist, they have never been observed from the ground, and if there were hundreds or thousands of them up there they would be obviously seen from the space station which is also fake. Proven fake over and over with experts on CGI manipulation, botched green screen scenes, water bubbles rising from suits as they work outside the station, astronauts bouncing back and forth as they give interviews with hidden harnesses on them, and fish-eye lenses used to fake the curvature of the earth.
I’m sorry sir, it is indeed ALL FABRICATION. Man is not in space, we are not on mars, in fact all the pictures leaked to youtube about mars fortunately have slightly visible signs of life, artifacts and even signs of water. This is part of their agenda for their fake alien invasion in our near future. Sure it all sounds like conspiracy. But the word NASA in ancient Hebrew mean lofty liar. sry for the ramble
Next post, we’ll go through this point-by-point.
Decay-Proof Record Scroll 